What is this project's purpose and need?

Map showing project extent, from highway 610 in the north to the 4th street exit in Downtown minneapolis.

Proposed project endpoints (termini) for the Hwy 252/I-94 project is Hwy 252 and Hwy 610 in Brooklyn Park to the north and I-94 and North 4th St./North 3rd St. in Minneapolis to the south. The Lowry Tunnel is located on I-94 approximately 1.5 miles south of the North 4th St./North 3rd St. entrance and exit ramps to downtown Minneapolis.

The Purpose

The purpose of the Hwy 252/I-94 Project is to improve the safe and reliable movement of people and goods across multiple modes on and across Hwy 252 and I-94 between Hwy 610 in Brooklyn Park and North 4th St. in Minneapolis.

The Need

The cities of Brooklyn Center, Brooklyn Park, and Minneapolis; Hennepin County; and MnDOT have identified several factors justifying the need for the Hwy 252/I-94 Project. The transportation needs for the Hwy 252/I-94 Project include vehicle safety, vehicle mobility, and walkability/bikeability.

Why is this project focusing on improving Hwy 252 and I-94?

Hwy 252 and I-94 need improvements for people driving, walking, biking, and taking transit.

Safety for people driving in vehicles

  • The full length of Hwy 252 and I-94 within the project area have a demonstrated crash problem.
  • Hwy 252 experienced a total of 1,512 crashes in 2016-2019 with an average of 378 crashes per year.
  • The average annual crash cost at intersections on Hwy 252 was between $500K and $1.7M totaling $6M in 2016-2019.
  • The average annual crash cost on segments along Hwy 252 was between $7M and $8M in 2016-2019.
  • The total average annual crash cost on Hwy 252 was between $13M and $14M in 2016-2019.
  • I-94 experienced a total of 914 crashes in 2016-2019 with an average of 229 crashes per year.
  • The average annual crash cost on I-94 was between $7M and $8M totaling $30M in 2016-2019.
  • Both Hwy 252 and I-94 exceed the state's critical crash rate.

Improvements for people walking and biking

  • Safety and mobility for walking, rolling, and biking in the corridor is a top priority. The existing and planned pedestrian and bicycle network within the corridor is fairly extensive.
  • Crossing Hwy 252 can be difficult due to number of lanes, crossing distances, and busy intersections.
  • I-94 has disproportionate crossing distances and poor-quality crossings (i.e. narrow sidewalks and no ADA accommodations).
  • Between 2016-2019 there were eleven reported pedestrian/bicycle crashes along I-94. No fatal crashes were reported.

Mobility for people driving in vehicles

  • Hwy 252/I-94 in the project area have a mobility problem based on multiple hours of congestion, reduced vehicle speeds, increases in delays, and poor travel time reliability.
  • Intersections along Hwy 252 operate poorly during peak hours.
  • Segments on I-94 between I-694 and the Lowry Tunnel are congested during peak hours.
  • There is a 12% increase in ridership forecasted for Hwy 252 and 4% increase for I-94.

Improvements for people using transit

  • Without any transit improvements, transit ridership along Hwy 252 is expected to increase by 700 riders in total by 2040.
  • According to fall 2019 data, transit ridership on express buses operating on I-94 is also expected to reach 16,300 by 2040.
  • 10 percent of morning transit riders along the corridor experience off-schedule trips due to congestion.
  • 20 percent of afternoon transit riders along the corridor experience off-schedule due to congestion (Fall 2019).

Connections

  • Crossings influence transit riders as many must cross the highway to reach their bus stops and park and rides.